By the benchmarking software Geekbench has shown the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, the company's almost top range CPU for portable equipment, and as we have been advancing months, this is where AMD will suffer the most, as we are facing basically 8 cores and 16 processing threads under the Zen3 + architecture (Zen3 @ 6nm TSMC) at a base / turbo frequency of 3.30 / 4.84 GHz (Ryzen 9 6980HX + 100 MHz) that
Let's go to what's interesting, the numbers, and that's that the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX was shown offering a monocleus score of 1593 points versus a multi-core score of 10151 points. This results in being 12% faster in mono performance and 33% faster in multicore compared to AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX which reaches a Turbo frequency of 4.60 GHz (-284 MHz).
Regarding the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X table (8 cores + 16 Zen3 threads @ 3.80 / 4.70 GHz), it is 7.8% slower in monocleus and -5.5% in multicleus.
Everyone asking if it's my anniversary or something... No ♪ my man just knows how to make me smile on a Monday https: / / t.co / Xb17ydLF3c
— r🤍y Mon Jul 26 23:42:37 +0000 2021
Now, if this looks like a great performance leap, when compared to its rival, the Intel core i9-12900H (and not the core i9-12900HK), we can see how this 14-core CPU and 20 processing threads (6x P-core @ 2.50 / 5.00 GHz + 8x E-core @ 1.80 / 3.80 GHz) is up to 21 percent faster in mono performance and up to 42 percent faster in multi-core performance. If we look for the worst scores in Geekbench, because at worst Intel CPU is 7% faster in monocleus and 37% faster in multicleus, which shows that in terms of performance they have nothing to do.
Both CPUs are sufficient, in terms of performance, for any user, so the price will be determinant.
Via: @ BenchLeaks @ Videocardz
